Skip to main content

Is ignorance of the law absolutely a no excuse under Ghana Law?

The Lartin Term "IGNORANTIA JURIS NON EXCUSAT" means ignorance of the law is no excuse.

This term simply means that if you do not know that something is unlawful and you do such an unlawful act, it's consequence will still be visited on you. For example, you cannot say that you did not know that touching someone without the person's consent is an assault. You will not be excused for not knowing it's a crime.

Under Section 29 (2) of the Criminal Offence Act of Ghana, this Lartin term has been codified and so it's no longer just a common law maxim but a law passed by parliament of Ghana. The said section says as follow: "A person shall not, except as in this Code otherwise expressly provided, be exempt from liability to punishment for any act on the ground of ignorance that the act is prohibited by law."

In simple terms, you are expected to know any law in Ghana whether you know in fact or not. Public Policy is that, it will be impracticable to excuse persons who claim they did not know of any law in place. So long as the law has been passed by the peoples representatives (Parliament) and signed by the people’s choice (President), everyone is deemed to have notice of that law.

There is however an exception to this law.

Section 29 (1) of the Criminal offences Act says that ignorance of fact is an excuse. This is a direct quote of the said section. "A person shall not be punished for any act which, by reason of ignorance or mistake of fact in good faith, he believes to be lawful."

This excuse is actually a solid defence in Criminal law. When a person has been charged with a crime in court and that person is able to prove that he or she was ignorant of a certain fact or mistaken of that fact, that person shall be set free.

This played out very well in the case of Nyameneba & others Vrs the State.

In that case, the appellants had been convicted of possession and use of Indian hemp which is a prohibited narcotic substance under Ghana Law.

The facts of the case is that, Nyamenaba was a leader of a religious group which believed that God had revealed the herbs of life to them. They openly cultivated the herb, smoked same, used for soups, concoctions and openly consumed the herbs. They encouraged all inhabitants of Princess Town where they lived to join their church and also use some of the herbs so that they will be right with God. They used it to heal several sick people with some success.

Even when the police came to arrest them, they boldly gave the police some of the herbs to try, telling the police that this is not Indian hemp but the herbs of life.

They successfully appealed their conviction and the Supreme Court held that the defence of ignorance of fact was available to these individuals since the circumstances of the case showed clearly that they were ignorant of a fact. That fact being that the herbs were Indian hemp.

So, whilst ignorance of Law is not an excuse, ignorance of fact is an excuse and a complete defence.

Watch out for the next explanation on simple everyday legal terms.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW TO DEAL WITH LOAN DEFAULT

    Social media has been buzzing with a picture of a writing on the walls of an alleged loan defaulter. The writings also allege that QUICK CREDIT, a popular loans company, is the person behind the writings. Let me say here that I have not done any independent check to confirm if Quick Credit is behind the writings on the walls of the person and this article is not in any way intended to take-on the said company but rather provide general advice to the public at large. This “quick credit” defaulter and other issues concerning how companies treat customers who default in paying loans has inspired my decision to take up this topic and share a few tips to both individuals and companies alike.   This Article will throw some light on the rights of a defaulter as well as the right of the creditor and what the two parties can safely do to ensure they do not fall at the wrong side of the law.   To set the tone, let me share the story of a client whose name I cannot mention....
1 comment
Read more

The legal status of properties purchased for or in the name of a “Slay Queen/Side Chick”, or “Side Guy”.

  One cannot help but notice that we are currently in an era of the booming " slay queen " business. There is also the growing trend of " side chick " and " side guy " relationships. In these trends, it is not unusual for properties to be acquired for or in the name of the “side chick”, or “side guy”. Most often when there is a fallout in these amorous relationships there is the issue of one party attempting to retrieve all properties purchased for or in the name of the other party. This is usually met with fierce resistance from the other party whom the said property was purchased for or in whose name it was purchased. The question is, will the purchaser of the said property be able to legally recover the said property from the person the property was purchased for or in whose name it was purchased.   Generally, a person who has legal title to a property is presumed to be the absolute owner of the property unless some other person can establish a bene...
Post a Comment
Read more

OF NOLLE PROSEQUI AND WITHDRAWALS – AT WHAT STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION CAN THEY BE ENTERED AND OF WHAT EFFECT DO THEY HAVE IN CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE IN GHANA?

  The Ghanaian media has been inundated with discussions on the state's decision to discontinue criminal prosecutions against several high-profile individuals of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) which were initiated by the erstwhile NPP government, including Samuel Ofosu Ampofo, Anthony Kwaku Boahen, Dr. Stephen Kwabena Opuni, and Seidu Agongo. The Attorney General's (AG) instruction to withdraw charges has raised questions about the distinction between a Nolle Prosequi and a withdrawal of charges.   It's unclear from the information provided whether the AG entered a Nolle Prosequi or simply withdrew the charges. The distinction is crucial, as a Nolle Prosequi would imply that the state is unwilling to continue the prosecution, while a withdrawal of charges might suggest that the prosecution is being discontinued due to other reasons.   This article examines the stages at which a Nolle prosequi and Withdrawal can be entered and their effects on criminal tria...
Post a Comment
Read more