Skip to main content

Is ignorance of the law absolutely a no excuse under Ghana Law?

The Lartin Term "IGNORANTIA JURIS NON EXCUSAT" means ignorance of the law is no excuse.

This term simply means that if you do not know that something is unlawful and you do such an unlawful act, it's consequence will still be visited on you. For example, you cannot say that you did not know that touching someone without the person's consent is an assault. You will not be excused for not knowing it's a crime.

Under Section 29 (2) of the Criminal Offence Act of Ghana, this Lartin term has been codified and so it's no longer just a common law maxim but a law passed by parliament of Ghana. The said section says as follow: "A person shall not, except as in this Code otherwise expressly provided, be exempt from liability to punishment for any act on the ground of ignorance that the act is prohibited by law."

In simple terms, you are expected to know any law in Ghana whether you know in fact or not. Public Policy is that, it will be impracticable to excuse persons who claim they did not know of any law in place. So long as the law has been passed by the peoples representatives (Parliament) and signed by the people’s choice (President), everyone is deemed to have notice of that law.

There is however an exception to this law.

Section 29 (1) of the Criminal offences Act says that ignorance of fact is an excuse. This is a direct quote of the said section. "A person shall not be punished for any act which, by reason of ignorance or mistake of fact in good faith, he believes to be lawful."

This excuse is actually a solid defence in Criminal law. When a person has been charged with a crime in court and that person is able to prove that he or she was ignorant of a certain fact or mistaken of that fact, that person shall be set free.

This played out very well in the case of Nyameneba & others Vrs the State.

In that case, the appellants had been convicted of possession and use of Indian hemp which is a prohibited narcotic substance under Ghana Law.

The facts of the case is that, Nyamenaba was a leader of a religious group which believed that God had revealed the herbs of life to them. They openly cultivated the herb, smoked same, used for soups, concoctions and openly consumed the herbs. They encouraged all inhabitants of Princess Town where they lived to join their church and also use some of the herbs so that they will be right with God. They used it to heal several sick people with some success.

Even when the police came to arrest them, they boldly gave the police some of the herbs to try, telling the police that this is not Indian hemp but the herbs of life.

They successfully appealed their conviction and the Supreme Court held that the defence of ignorance of fact was available to these individuals since the circumstances of the case showed clearly that they were ignorant of a fact. That fact being that the herbs were Indian hemp.

So, whilst ignorance of Law is not an excuse, ignorance of fact is an excuse and a complete defence.

Watch out for the next explanation on simple everyday legal terms.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RAPE AND OTHER SEXUAL OFFENCES IN GHANA

    Whilst sex is a very important part of humanity, it also has calamitous consequences when it happens wrongly. This article is not intended to look at spiritual or medical consequences of sex but rather the legal consequences of sex when not done right in Ghana. So, in effect, I shall be taking you through some offences in Ghana which can be classified as sexual offences.     Rape seems to be the commonest sexual offence known by many people. But even so, there is a very widely accepted wrong impression, that rape is forceful or violent sex with a woman. This article will try to explain what rape really is, and its consequences. It shall also explore some other sexual offences such as Defilement, Carnal Knowledge, Indecent Assault, Unnatural Carnal Knowledge, Incest, Householder permitting Defilement of a child, Procuration, Seduction or Prostitution of a child under sixteen, and Compulsion of Marriage .   RAPE Rape is a very serious offence bec...

WHAT IS A VALID MARRIAGE? THE RIGHTS OF A SPOUSE AND CHILDREN OF AN INFORMAL CUSTOMARY MARRIAGE IN VIEW

A young lady approached me and said: Mr. Lawyer, I have been living with my partner for the past four years? He got me pregnant whiles I was an apprentice with a hairdressing saloon. After the pregnancy, he came to “see” my parents and accepted responsibility. He came with his father who presented a bottle of schnapps to my father. After I gave birth, he came to perform the naming ceremony after which he asked me to move in to live with him. I have supported him to do his business and also build his chamber and hall apartment which we live in now. He now has two shops where he sells hardware. I used to sell at one of the shops, whiles he sells in the other, but he has recently stopped me from going to the other shop. He claims I am spending his money. The Truth is, he doesn’t provide regular money at home, so I usually use some of the sales to buy foodstuff to cook for the three of us. I have discussed with him, that he should help me set up my own hair dressing saloon so I don’t ask h...

PUNISHMENT FOR DEFRAUDING BY FALSE PRETENCES IN GHANA: THE CASE OF AGRADAA’S 15 YEAR JAIL TERM

  Madam Patricia Asiedua popularly known as Agradaa was handed a 15-year jail term yesterday by the Accra Circuit Court.   Many have argued that the jail term is excessive and harsh. This write up is aimed at throwing some light on the offense she committed and the available punishments for the court, given her circumstances, so that readers can have an informed basis to argue on whether or not the sentence was excessive.   Ms. Asiedua was charged amongst other offences, with, Defrauding by false pretences. Since I do not have the benefit of the full charge sheet, I shall discuss only the offence of defrauding by false pretences and perhaps update myself if I see the full charge sheet and get to know of the other offences she was charged in addition to this one.   But what readers must bear in mind is that, whenever two or more offences are charged and proved against a person, the courts would usually hand over sentence for all the offences. However, it i...