Skip to main content

VACANT PARLIAMENTARY SEATS CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT (DOWNLOAD FULL CASE IN PDF) ALEXANDER AFENYO MARKINS VRS SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT

 


On the 12th day of November, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ghana by a majority decision of 5 -2, interpreted Article 97 (1) (g ) & (h) to the effect that a member of parliament who files nominations to contest elections on the ticket of a different political party other than the one for which he/she was elected as member of parliament, does loose his seat as a member of the current parliament. 

This decision has drawn sharp division in views of opinion leaders, lawyers, academics and jurists.  In order to understand the reasoning behind the opinions of the two sides of the bench, you are encouraged to read the full case which can be downloaded in this article.

 

WHO ARE THE JUSTICES 


Majority

Y. DARKO ASARE J.S.C

PG. SACKEY TORKONOO J.S.C (CJ), 

M. OWUSU J.S.C., 

Y. GAEWU J.S.C.  

S.K.A. ASIEDU J.S.C.


Minority (dissenting)

Tanko Amadu J.S.C. 

Lovelace -Johnson J.S.C

 

SUMMARY OF CASE

Four members of the 8th parliament of Ghana, one person from the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and three from the New Patriotic Party (NPP) majority side in parliament, were declared by the speaker of parliament to have vacated their seats. This is because three of them had filed nominations as independent candidates whilst one of them who is currently an independent MP for Fomena Constituency has now filed his nomination to contest as an NPP candidate for the constituency.

Before the Speaker made his declaration in Parliament, the Majority Leader, Alexaner Afenyo Markins filed a writ for the interpretation of Article 97 (1) (g) & (h) in the Supreme Court.

The said provision says as follows: A member of Parliament shall vacate his seat in Parliament, (g) if he leaves the party of which he was a member at the time of his election to Parliament to join another party or seeks to remain in Parliament as an independent member; or (h) if he was elected a member of Parliament as an independent candidate and joins a political party.

Based on this and other jurisprudential considerations, the Majority of the Supreme Court has held that a person who files his nomination to contest on a different political party's ticket for election into a future parliament (in this case the 9th parliament) cannot be said to have vacated his seat in the current parliament (the 8th parliament).

The Minority Justices have also disagreed. They have also argued amongst others, that the the right court to have handled this case was the high court and not the Supreme Court and that the high court could have started the case and remitted the interpretation aspect to the Supreme Court. They based their arguments on Article 99 (1) of the constitution which states as follows: "The High Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any question whether - (a) a person has been validly elected as a member of Parliament or the seat of a member has become vacant".

Well, the Supreme Court has spoken and the decision of the majority is the LAW.

What do you think about this ruling of the Supreme Court. Let’s discuss your views in the comments section below.

You can read/ download the Full PDF version of the Judgment of the Supreme Court  by clinking this link. FULL JUDGMENT.

Kindly subscribe to this blog for updates whenever I post a new article. You can also follow or subscribe to my contents on the following social media channels so we have more interactions. FACEBOOK, TIKTOK, YOU TUBE.  

 

Yours Truly,

 

Richard Nii Amarh


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW TO DEAL WITH LOAN DEFAULT

    Social media has been buzzing with a picture of a writing on the walls of an alleged loan defaulter. The writings also allege that QUICK CREDIT, a popular loans company, is the person behind the writings. Let me say here that I have not done any independent check to confirm if Quick Credit is behind the writings on the walls of the person and this article is not in any way intended to take-on the said company but rather provide general advice to the public at large. This “quick credit” defaulter and other issues concerning how companies treat customers who default in paying loans has inspired my decision to take up this topic and share a few tips to both individuals and companies alike.   This Article will throw some light on the rights of a defaulter as well as the right of the creditor and what the two parties can safely do to ensure they do not fall at the wrong side of the law.   To set the tone, let me share the story of a client whose name I cannot mention....
1 comment
Read more

The legal status of properties purchased for or in the name of a “Slay Queen/Side Chick”, or “Side Guy”.

  One cannot help but notice that we are currently in an era of the booming " slay queen " business. There is also the growing trend of " side chick " and " side guy " relationships. In these trends, it is not unusual for properties to be acquired for or in the name of the “side chick”, or “side guy”. Most often when there is a fallout in these amorous relationships there is the issue of one party attempting to retrieve all properties purchased for or in the name of the other party. This is usually met with fierce resistance from the other party whom the said property was purchased for or in whose name it was purchased. The question is, will the purchaser of the said property be able to legally recover the said property from the person the property was purchased for or in whose name it was purchased.   Generally, a person who has legal title to a property is presumed to be the absolute owner of the property unless some other person can establish a bene...
Post a Comment
Read more

RAPE AND OTHER SEXUAL OFFENCES IN GHANA

    Whilst sex is a very important part of humanity, it also has calamitous consequences when it happens wrongly. This article is not intended to look at spiritual or medical consequences of sex but rather the legal consequences of sex when not done right in Ghana. So, in effect, I shall be taking you through some offences in Ghana which can be classified as sexual offences.     Rape seems to be the commonest sexual offence known by many people. But even so, there is a very widely accepted wrong impression, that rape is forceful or violent sex with a woman. This article will try to explain what rape really is, and its consequences. It shall also explore some other sexual offences such as Defilement, Carnal Knowledge, Indecent Assault, Unnatural Carnal Knowledge, Incest, Householder permitting Defilement of a child, Procuration, Seduction or Prostitution of a child under sixteen, and Compulsion of Marriage .   RAPE Rape is a very serious offence bec...
5 comments
Read more