Skip to main content

VACANT PARLIAMENTARY SEATS CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT (DOWNLOAD FULL CASE IN PDF) ALEXANDER AFENYO MARKINS VRS SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT

 


On the 12th day of November, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ghana by a majority decision of 5 -2, interpreted Article 97 (1) (g ) & (h) to the effect that a member of parliament who files nominations to contest elections on the ticket of a different political party other than the one for which he/she was elected as member of parliament, does loose his seat as a member of the current parliament. 

This decision has drawn sharp division in views of opinion leaders, lawyers, academics and jurists.  In order to understand the reasoning behind the opinions of the two sides of the bench, you are encouraged to read the full case which can be downloaded in this article.

 

WHO ARE THE JUSTICES 


Majority

Y. DARKO ASARE J.S.C

PG. SACKEY TORKONOO J.S.C (CJ), 

M. OWUSU J.S.C., 

Y. GAEWU J.S.C.  

S.K.A. ASIEDU J.S.C.


Minority (dissenting)

Tanko Amadu J.S.C. 

Lovelace -Johnson J.S.C

 

SUMMARY OF CASE

Four members of the 8th parliament of Ghana, one person from the National Democratic Congress (NDC) and three from the New Patriotic Party (NPP) majority side in parliament, were declared by the speaker of parliament to have vacated their seats. This is because three of them had filed nominations as independent candidates whilst one of them who is currently an independent MP for Fomena Constituency has now filed his nomination to contest as an NPP candidate for the constituency.

Before the Speaker made his declaration in Parliament, the Majority Leader, Alexaner Afenyo Markins filed a writ for the interpretation of Article 97 (1) (g) & (h) in the Supreme Court.

The said provision says as follows: A member of Parliament shall vacate his seat in Parliament, (g) if he leaves the party of which he was a member at the time of his election to Parliament to join another party or seeks to remain in Parliament as an independent member; or (h) if he was elected a member of Parliament as an independent candidate and joins a political party.

Based on this and other jurisprudential considerations, the Majority of the Supreme Court has held that a person who files his nomination to contest on a different political party's ticket for election into a future parliament (in this case the 9th parliament) cannot be said to have vacated his seat in the current parliament (the 8th parliament).

The Minority Justices have also disagreed. They have also argued amongst others, that the the right court to have handled this case was the high court and not the Supreme Court and that the high court could have started the case and remitted the interpretation aspect to the Supreme Court. They based their arguments on Article 99 (1) of the constitution which states as follows: "The High Court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any question whether - (a) a person has been validly elected as a member of Parliament or the seat of a member has become vacant".

Well, the Supreme Court has spoken and the decision of the majority is the LAW.

What do you think about this ruling of the Supreme Court. Let’s discuss your views in the comments section below.

You can read/ download the Full PDF version of the Judgment of the Supreme Court  by clinking this link. FULL JUDGMENT.

Kindly subscribe to this blog for updates whenever I post a new article. You can also follow or subscribe to my contents on the following social media channels so we have more interactions. FACEBOOK, TIKTOK, YOU TUBE.  

 

Yours Truly,

 

Richard Nii Amarh


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OF NOLLE PROSEQUI AND WITHDRAWALS – AT WHAT STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION CAN THEY BE ENTERED AND OF WHAT EFFECT DO THEY HAVE IN CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE IN GHANA?

  The Ghanaian media has been inundated with discussions on the state's decision to discontinue criminal prosecutions against several high-profile individuals of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) which were initiated by the erstwhile NPP government, including Samuel Ofosu Ampofo, Anthony Kwaku Boahen, Dr. Stephen Kwabena Opuni, and Seidu Agongo. The Attorney General's (AG) instruction to withdraw charges has raised questions about the distinction between a Nolle Prosequi and a withdrawal of charges.   It's unclear from the information provided whether the AG entered a Nolle Prosequi or simply withdrew the charges. The distinction is crucial, as a Nolle Prosequi would imply that the state is unwilling to continue the prosecution, while a withdrawal of charges might suggest that the prosecution is being discontinued due to other reasons.   This article examines the stages at which a Nolle prosequi and Withdrawal can be entered and their effects on criminal tria...
Post a Comment
Read more

HOW TO DEAL WITH LOAN DEFAULT

    Social media has been buzzing with a picture of a writing on the walls of an alleged loan defaulter. The writings also allege that QUICK CREDIT, a popular loans company, is the person behind the writings. Let me say here that I have not done any independent check to confirm if Quick Credit is behind the writings on the walls of the person and this article is not in any way intended to take-on the said company but rather provide general advice to the public at large. This “quick credit” defaulter and other issues concerning how companies treat customers who default in paying loans has inspired my decision to take up this topic and share a few tips to both individuals and companies alike.   This Article will throw some light on the rights of a defaulter as well as the right of the creditor and what the two parties can safely do to ensure they do not fall at the wrong side of the law.   To set the tone, let me share the story of a client whose name I cannot mention....
1 comment
Read more

MOTIVATION - MY ELEVEN YEARS JOURNEY TO THE BAR

    Somewhere in the first quarter of 2010, I received a call from Alexnder Osei Owusu (Lexis). I was then serving as a National Service person at the Akuapem Rural Bank in Mamfe – Akuapem. Lexis was my friend in council when we both served students in leadership positions at the University of Cape Coast.   I had discussed with him whilst we were yet to graduate, that I would like to study law after my first degree. He had seen a newspaper advert which was almost expiring so he called to prompt me. He said, Nii, tomorrow is the deadline for submission, have you submitted already and my answer was a no. I therefore had to quickly get permission from the office to go and buy the University of Ghana Admission forms and apply for the Post First Degree LLB. Everything was hand-written on physical forms and submitted physically at that time. I did not have my transcript at the time and it meant, I needed to travel to Cape Coast the next day, get the transcript and some reco...
4 comments
Read more